《英语读后感带翻译【优秀11篇】》

时间：2025-09-21 05:11

英语读后感是一种文学作品的评价和思考，它能够帮助读者更好地理解和感受所读的书籍。

英语读后感 1

Recently, I read Helen Keller's autobiography, "Three Days to light "， so that really touch me.

"If my sight for three days "， focuses on the troubled life of the also blind and deaf Helen Keller, and her mentality. Her life only has 19 months of light and sound. Anne Sally and the other teachers to help care for the sake of friends and family, Helen overe the difficulties of ordinary people can not imagine the pleted an academic of Harvard University ， with excellent the results obtained a bachelor's degree. She has always been mitted to the cause of the handicapped, four fund-raising to improve the living environment for people with disabilities, and to create educational opportunities for them. She has traveled around the world, cheering for the disabled. Eventually Helen became a prominent philanthropist, speaker and educator.

This article gave me the greatest inspiration to correctly treat the difficulties are difficulties in everyone's life. Encounter difficulties, do not be afraid to retreat, and to find ways to be difficult to overe, overe difficulties is also progress in the process. The same time, there must be optimistic and positive good mentality. Helen was a tremendous blow, and the face of difficulties, not plaining, but the optimistic attitude to face, to get confidence. Good upbeat attitude is one of the important factors for success.

英语读后感带翻译 2

Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.

The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.

The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.

How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens—he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.

For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.

To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.

Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’

雾都孤儿狄更斯最著名的作品之一，是一种新型的，反映在18世纪生活在英国的这一悲惨的事实。

写这本小说的作者是谁，本人出生在一个贫穷的家庭，在他20多岁，以期揭示了丑陋的面具，这些残忍的罪犯，并揭露隐藏下方的狭窄和肮脏的街道在伦敦的恐怖和暴力。

这本小说的主人公雾都孤儿“，是个孤儿，被扔进世界充满贫困和犯罪。他遭受了巨大的痛苦，如饥饿，口渴，殴打和虐待。在阅读的小奥利弗的悲惨遭遇，我感到非常震惊，他的苦难。我觉得可怜的孩子，但在同一时间，我憎恨邪恶的费根和残酷的条例草案。我的救济，是写在所有的最好的故事，善良最终征服魔鬼和奥利弗到底过着幸福的生活。其中，最吸引我的田块，盗窃后，小奥利弗被允许恢复在撒谎，但这夫人的亲切关怀和玫瑰又开始了新的生活。他去散步，或玫瑰念给他听，他努力在他的教训。他觉得好像他留下永远犯罪和困苦和贫穷的世界。

试问这样的小男孩已经遭受压迫的'苦难保持纯洁的身体和心灵？原因是善良的本质。我觉得这是最重要的信息，暗示在小说的狄更斯，他相信善良可以征服一切困难。虽然我

对于我来说，善良的本质是一个人最需要的字符之一。善良是人类的水是什么鱼。他是谁不善良是一钱不值的人。相反，正如一句名言所说，“香味总是停留在手，让玫瑰，谁是他的善良，无疑是一个快乐的和有用的人。接受他的帮助的人感谢他，他也被从他的所作所为感到欣慰，因此，他可以做的很好的人，他帮助自己。

我失望的是，时下一些人似乎怀疑存在的人性的善良。他们看不起人的诚实和善良，愚蠢的因此，他们表现出的不是同情，那些谁遇到了麻烦，很少提供帮助别人。另一方面，他们重视金钱和利益。在他们看来，金钱是唯一真正的对象，而情感和道德虚无。如果他们不能获得利润，从他们的好意，他们退后，当别人都面临着麻烦，甚至打到了人，当他下来。他们的种种，我真的很反感。

弗朗西斯·培根在他的文章中说，“天哪，所有的美德和尊严的心灵，是最伟大的，神的性格，如果没有它，人是一个繁忙的，淘气的，猥琐的东西，丝毫不比一种害虫。”

英语读后感 3

i don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, i would rather regard the section that jane began her teaching job in thornfield as the film’s end----especially when i heard jane’s words “never in my life have i been awaken so happily.” for one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. but the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: there must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of jane’s life that “life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”

英语的读后感 4

"La Traviata" is a classic immortal novel, has swept the world, tens of millions of issuance, opera, drama, film and television works of thousands. The author Dumas with his portrayal of life to weave a poor, pathetic, alas, lovely, amiable, respectable prostitute destiny, La Traviata Margaret in the fickleness of the world customs, social background, to find a true love, and this love will be kept out of the world. Poor a roll of Camellia female, broken all the world swing son soul!

Poor and amiable - and Armand love, to love the innocent Margaret, everything can be sacrificed to her as long as he loves himself, nothing more. She had to reduce the burden of Armand, secretly sold her jewelry, jewelry, which fully shows a amiable girl pure, selfless, pursuit and persistence of love, but her purity can not resist the Armand really loved the seven emotions and six sensory pleasures, although Margaret, but because of the misunderstanding, blindly extreme suspicion. The results hard to revenge, with their love shame so innocent and poor young girl. Good people, the heart of evil, although this is proportional to, but I have to say the good may become evil, evil will become good, both of which are closely related, it is these people so I know, everyone on the beauty, it is very easy to be found, you will get to know it is why, perhaps, no, yes, Margaret is no way to change a prostitute, but in the real, beautiful style, showing a poor and amiable highbrow.

Sad and lovely Margaret on his own career prostitute hated, in life, only the transaction and the false display of affection, the naked money relations, break the pale, here, she had thought of himself as great scourges, like a pariah scorned, some day in the future, will be like a dog who can not destroy others also, ruined himself. She did not voluntarily choose this dirty road, but she was forced by society. I think it is because of this sad fate that inspired her and bravely found what she really wanted and looked forward to. And Armand abandoned all the pursuit of their own happiness, spent in the country, I think it is the only happy time in her life, she is like a child, lively, naive. She is trying to be an ordinary person, ordinary appearance, ordinary life, at least they can make her happy, not by money, she is worthy of love, because of her courage, because of her persistence, because her in the real, fling caution to the winds, touch tone, showing a a sad and lovely beautiful and elegant figure.

Alas, Armand and Margaret - honorable matchmaking old prostitute F Lui Don S during the debt in her ill, and not only what did not help her, but don't even see her, it shows what? It was the complex darkness of society at that time, but a kind woman who could not get any relief. Armand and her girlfriend OLIMP collusion hurt be Margaret, what she can do, because Armand no longer believe her, she had to write her voice in the diary, which explains what? Margaret is the cry sad tired of hard life, is a respectable figure, a lost death scene. Margaret worthy of respect, people's hearts are the most incisive Jiachou foil the soul of the value.

Article two: [reading] Camille

This is a Dumas "La Traviata" report. I have read this book for a short period of time, feeling really profound feelings and thinking, to record their own, but think what questions can't express my feeling after reading, whether it is the vision of imagination or grief, mourning, feel is not accurate enough, if it is called the book, I also simple. Can make the only correct title.

Who is the most noble and respectable whore in the world? Believe that more than half of the people will say "Margaret"， do not rule out that some will say that Du Shiniang, Li Shishi or something, but their influence is significantly less than the former. Indeed, she is beautiful. Pure, kind and selfless, elegant, although prostitution. Still maintain a pure heart and independent personality. She is the lover of Armand's love is as keen as selfless enough to commendable. Besides, Margaret is out of shape based on the true story of the processing, and his portrait is really beautiful.

Of course, the novel is not to depict the highlight of Margaret's appearance and character, mainly the sentimental love story, and the end of doomed tragedy, and the real delicate psychological description. Especially Armand's psychological description is simply an inspired passage. The truth, the substitution of sex, are not questioned. As if he were Armand, Margaret's love, is his own love for her.

Generally speaking, a novel is a tragedy, a tragic tragedy, and this tragedy is inevitable. Fireworks women's love is so difficult to think over, and men's paranoia and monopoly desire will inevitably lead to the development of this tragedy. While I was reading, I was wondering if Armand was a Scorpio, and that personality seemed to be the picture of the sky crab. However, there is no way to verify it. In fact, no matter what constellation, as long as falling in love with a man, will inevitably have the same idea as he.

I don't need to say more about the plot of the novel. It's so famous. I'm sure most people would have read it. Even my mother has seen it. At the end I talk about the author of the novel Dumas.

Dumas was Alexandre Dumas's illegitimate child, at the age of 7 was admitted by Alexandre Dumas. I like Alexandre Dumas's work very much. Popular, but it has an unusual appeal. From the view of the camellia girl, the book is difficult to find the shadow of Alexandre Dumas, but still the same classics, long lasting. The book was written by the author when he was 24 years old, based on his own experience. At that time, the prototype of the camellia woman had just died. By the famous dumas. That's what we call "dead money."。 Little man has many works in his life, but no one can compare with his own confession, which is another great tragedy of his.

英语读后感 5

The novel is rich in poetry, symbolism and metaphor. It does not fit easily into a definite pattern, being neither a novel of "manners" in the tradition of Austen, or a straightforward Gothic Romance in the style of Mrs Radcliffe. What Charlotte Bronte did was to create a work which cleverly blends elements of the two styles, and which remains uniquely independent of them at the same time, since it addresses issues which were at the time rather controversial.

The novel is written in the first person, and thus magnifies the central character - the reader enters the world of Jane Eyre and is transported through her experiences at first hand. This at once makes the work subjective, especially since we know that Charlottes Brontes own life and experiences were so closely interwoven with the heroines. As well as this we learn only at the end of the novel that the events are being related to us ten years after the reconciliation with Rochester - thus the narrative is RETROSPECTIVE （looking back）。 CB is clever in blending the narrative so that at times Jane seems to be speaking as an adult with adult hindsight ， while at others she she is "in the middle" of them, as a child or young woman. The indecision which is a central issue in the book, is heightened by this device. We never know, as readers, whether to be entirely trustful of Janes actions and thoughts, because we are never sure wheher she is speaking impulsively or maturely.

This intensifies the readers dilemma as to what is "right" and "wrong" in the dramatic relationships which are part of JEs life. Can we believe what the heroine says, or is she deceiving herself? The novel is primarily a love story and a "romance" where wishes come true but only after trials and suffering. The supernatural has its place, as do dreams, portents and prophesies. The heroine begins poor and lonely and ends up rich and loved; the orphan finds a good family to replace the wicked one; all the basic ingredients of classic romantic fairytale are present.

The romantic element is present in two forms in Jane Eyre; the "family" aspect is dealt with in the Gateshead, Lowood and Moor House episodes, which involve the exchanging of the wicked Reed family for the benevolent Rivers one; and the Love romance is dealt with in the Thornfield and Ferndean episodes. Both aspects are, of course linked and interwoven throughout the novel.

英语读后感 6

After reading Robinson Crusoe, I am shocked at it, and I really admire Robinson. I admire his spirit of not retreating when being in trouble. He lived in an uninhabited island for about 26 years and encountered many difficulties which are beyond our imagination. He survives on his perseverance and faith; what"s more, he created the new life.

His spirit is worth learning, which is that we can"t surpass. I still more admire his ability of bearing loneliness. From my point of view, all of us are survive in the society without families and friends. If I were Robinson, I should rely on myself to survive but I couldn"t bear the isolated life. Now we may not aware how important the emotion is.

However, if we encounter that condition like Robinson"s, we may know that we are not individuals, and we can"t live alone in the world. Kinship, friendship and love are indispensable in our life, and they are priceless treasure which are worth maintaining by our life.

英语读后感 7

In recent days, I read the book Tom thumb 。 You must really want to know what kind child Tom was, let me introduce you to it.

Tom was born as big as our thumb. So his parents called him Tom Thumb. Although Tom was small, he was very clever. And his parents loved him very much. One day, his father took Tom to the forest to cut some wood. Two businessmen saw Tom and they wanted to earned money with him. They wanted to gave Tom’s father some money and bought him. But the woodcutter refused to sell his son. Clever little Tom knew these two men were very bad so he asked his father to did so and told him he would come back soon. Clever Tom escaped from the bad men and helped many people on his way home. Finally, he lived happily with his parents.

As we know ‘ Dog doesn’t eat dog’。 I believe that everybody’s parents will love their child heart and soul just like Tom’s parents. So, please love our parents, too. From the story I also know that Tom is very clever and brave, he try his best to help the people in need. His spirit is well worth learning.

英语读后感 8

The final goodbye to my very pity, the little prince want to can have a more magical magic to keep his body, more to retain his soul, so the fox and the pilot would not be thinking of the wheat color with golden hair.

But I knew it was impossible, because on the other star, the only rose in his heart was the one that lived in the star called b-612.

英语读后感 9

It appears that Plato’s Apology remains the authentic material revealing the details of Socrates’ self-defense, showing that Socrates mainly was accused of two offenses. For one thing, he was charged of corrupting young people’s mind with his philosophical preaching. For another, he was accused of being a complete atheist.

Socrates’ self-defense, in those two aspects, might seem a little bit like sophism诡辩。 For the first accusation, Socrates stressed that if he was the only corruptor of youth whereas there were so many improvers like the judges in the court, he would by no means have accomplished the task of poisoning young minds. He also mentioned as people shared the common sense to be benefited rather than harmed, it’s unlikely that he could fool people successfully. (The second argument sounds tricky, as most people are just following suits in their lives, so probably it would be hard for one to realize if he was fooled or not.)For the second one, he refuted by stating that as a man could not believe in spiritual and divine agencies without faith in spirits and demigods, and as the accuser had sworn in the indictment诉讼 that Socrates taught and believe in the above-mentioned agencies, Socrates himself could not be termed as an atheist.

From my standpoint of view, his refutation appeared very clever but I was doubtful whether his fellow Athenians could either understand or accept it. It is noted that Socrates attempted to analyze the origin of the accusers’ enmity before defending himself against the two charges. His reasoning nevertheless demonstrated his pride as a remarkably intelligent philosopher as he deemed that politicians, poets and artisans were no wiser, with the observation that those people possessed only pretensions of wisdom and little knowledge of their own limitations.

However, to be frank, who could willingly acknowledge his own ignorance and accept this exposure of defect by a proud philosopher like Socrates? Besides, Socrates considered himself as empowered by god to rigorously and critically examine people around him. In other words, his philosophical questioning carried divine purpose, according to his own remarks. I reckon these statements could gain popularity only among ablest people with equally sublimate mind, who, sadly, were never the majority. And I would hereby venture to say that’s probably the reason why Socrates lost his case by a small margin.

Actually, I think Socrates’ philosophical reflection of life’s meaning stood out in the defense, as he emphatically claimed that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” For instance, he quoted Achilles’ choice between a short and glorious life and a long and mediocre one as an argument for “the fear of death is the pretense of wisdom”。 He would submit his own life later to prove this point. In addition, he predicted that should Athens claim his life, the citizens would hurt themselves more than they would hurt him, as they would not easily find his substitute. He further explained that he had no interest in public and state affairs, for he’s not the man to survive and thrive in those matters. And finally, he would not plead for his life as he thought such deed would debase himself. He even painted poetically the afterlife of possible converse with Orpheus and Musaeus and Hesiod and Homer, exemplifying his emphasis on the immortality of the soul.

英文读后感 10

This winter vacation,I read agreat book《Bookworm》.In gread 1,I appreciate the beauty of the moon,and,I know Mary,queen of Soctss story……In a word,I benefited a lot of in really like this book.

Among them,my favourite book is《Love or money》.It tells a rich women death is suspect,and they greeted her moneys mouth little daughter threatens her,to obtain money;on the surface seems to love her big daughter to reasons but hater mother;her son to a piece of land and mother fell out……

Results a murderer is her big daughter!Reason have to her the person I love !

I was very girl,actually killed her mother,is really too not filial know people for a variety of reasons will kill your most should control oneself,avoid incentive,not reckless things……

The《Book worm》 has taught me a lot.

英文读后感 11

An Analysis of Jane Eyre

The novel is written in the first person, and thus magnifies the central character - the reader enters the world of Jane Eyre and is transported through her experiences at first hand. This at once makes the work subjective, especially since we know that Charlottes Brontes own life and experiences were so closely interwoven with the heroines. As well as this we learn only at the end of the novel that the events are being related to us ten years after the reconciliation with Rochester - thus the narrative is RETROSPECTIVE (looking back). CB is clever in blending the narrative so that at times Jane seems to be speaking as an adult with adult hindsight , while at others she she is "in the middle" of them, as a child or young woman. The indecision which is a central issue in the book, is heightened by this device. We never know, as readers, whether to be entirely trustful of Janes actions and thoughts, because we are never sure wheher she is speaking impulsively or maturely.

There is also a strong element of realism in the novel, which, married to the romantic aspect, enhances the novels strength.The sense of place is very strong; we are able to experience both exterior and interior settings with startling clarity throughout the story, in a series of vivid deive passages. The central characters are also realistic and their confrontations and sufferings change them in a believable way.

Even the unlikely is made plausible, with a unique blend of high drama and perceptive low comedy (the attack on Mason, for instance)

The more fantastic romantic aspects; the coincidences; the secrets; the supernatural occurrences, are balanced by the realism, and this is of course a major strength.

The Gothic influence cannot be ignored, although CB has refined the technique considerably from the "authentic" Gothic of the 1790s. In the original genre, the heroine would typically be abducted and threatened with seduction, or worse!. There would be a lover - a respectable, well-bred young man - who would endeavor to rescue the heroine and would succeed after many trial. the seducer would be a brigand "Know that I adore Corsairs!" and he would lock the girl up in a remote castle.

There was little freedom for middle class women during the period of the Gothic novel, and this was still the case in the time of CB. Marriage especially was often a bargain, whereby fortunes were secured by using the female as a pawn. A womans value largely depended therefore on her sexual purity and she was guarded and secured as a result. Men, on the contrary, were potent and free; lovers and mistresses were common. Ironically the women who provided their services were social outcasts as a result.

In Jane Eyre we see elements of the Gothic romance, in that Thornfield Hall and Rochester are described very much in the brigand/castle style BUT Jane Eyre is not abducted by R. On the contrary she chooses to go there of her own free will. AND she is clear in her determination to have Rochester as a husband. Neither is there a gentleman rescuer; St John Rivers may look like a Greek God, but he is neither kind nor benevolent; driving Jane back to Ferndean, not rescuing her from it.

The trials which the hero is supposed to undergo in a Gothic romance are in fact undergone by the heroine in Jane Eyre. The bandit Rochester is only skin-deep. Underneath the brooding exterior is a sensitive soul, which a WOMAN frees. In this way we see that CB created rather a daring departure from conventional fiction, although there are still many aspects of the novel which remain true to Victorian convention!